ChatGPT
Claude
Perplexity
Google AI
Grok
You are here:
Dynamics AX vs Microsoft Dynamics 365: Practical Insights for Smarter ERP Decisions
Understand the practical differences between Dynamics AX and Dynamics 365 to make informed, future-ready decisions.
Neha Bhagat
Senior Director – Microsoft Dynamics (Practice Head)
June 3, 2025
Mainstream support for Dynamics AX 2009 SP1, AX 2012, and AX 2012 R2 expired on October 9, 2018, with extended support, which includes security hotfixes, ending on April 12, 2022. Mainstream support for Dynamics AX 2012 R3 expired on October 12, 2021, and remained available via extended support through January 10, 2023.
Though Dynamics 365 vs AX have similar core ERP features in finance, procurement, and manufacturing, the transition to Dynamics 365 is a significant shift, particularly in infrastructure, from on-premises to a cloud-first strategy.
And that’s only the beginning, there’s a lot more that differentiates these platforms.
From Updates to Upgrades: What’s Changing?
One of the most critical differences between Dynamics 365 vs Dynamics AX is how updates and upgrades are managed.
Microsoft AX uses intricate application layers that need manual updates—hotfixes, cumulative updates, service packs, and feature packs—all of which require diligent documentation review and have inherent risks, particularly in highly customized environments. The process is frequently time-consuming, prone to errors, and resource-hungry.
In contrast, Dynamics 365 follows a modern upgrade approach using extensions instead of overlays, making updates lighter, faster, and less disruptive. Major upgrades occur twice a year, while monthly updates are applied automatically with minimal effort—users can opt in with a simple click. Built-in testing tools and analytics further streamline the process, reducing downtime, costs, and risks compared to Microsoft AX vs Dynamics 365 scenarios.
Conversely, Dynamics 365 adopts a contemporary upgrade methodology with extensions rather than overlays, providing lighter, quicker, and less disruptive updates. Significant upgrades are performed twice a year, and monthly updates are automatically installed with little effort; users can opt in with one click. Integral test tools and analytics also ease the process further, minimizing downtime, costs, and risk relative to Microsoft AX vs Dynamics 365 scenarios.
Dynamics 365 vs Dynamics AX Pricing
In the Dynamics 365 vs AX debate, pricing models are a major differentiator.
With AX, you pay a license fee (perhaps a physical disk, depending on the edition) for rights to the software.
If you’re new to using cloud solutions, you may think you’re saving cash by paying one upfront fee, but that upfront purchase is just the start. AX is a capital expense with a big up-front payment and yearly maintenance versus the Op-ex pay-as-you-go model.
On-premises expenses pile up quickly. You’re paying for physical servers, hosting, preventative maintenance, storage upgrades, cybersecurity software/monitoring, warehouse space, the cost of running equipment 24/7, and employing a whole team of IT experts to keep you secure and online.
When you migrate operations to the cloud, compute and licensing are factored into your subscription. It’s a much better bargain because you don’t have to keep infrastructure and host VMs.
Upgrading, computing, and hosting responsibilities become Microsoft’s headache. This enables you to avoid risks such as outages, hardware destruction, security breaches, legal non-compliance, etc., and lower TCO.
You’ll only pay for what you consume on a predictable, monthly basis, and you won’t have to bother with maintenance and upgrades.
| Criteria | Dynamics AX | Dynamics 365 |
|---|---|---|
|
Support Status |
Ended (Extended support ended in 2023) |
Fully supported with regular updates |
|
Deployment & Hosting |
On-premises; requires physical servers, manual setup, and complex configuration. |
Cloud-based (Azure); automated deployment with guided setup wizards, no infrastructure needed. |
|
Update & Upgrade Management |
Manual updates using overlays; prone to errors and delays, especially in customized environments. |
Automated updates via extensions, bi-annual major releases, and monthly updates with minimal disruption. |
|
Customization Approach |
Overlay model; custom code layered over base code, leading to risky merges during updates. |
Extension-based; base code cannot be altered, making updates safer, faster, and with fewer disruptions. |
|
Pricing Model |
CapEx (large upfront license fee plus annual maintenance); high on-prem costs for servers, IT, maintenance, etc. |
OpEx (subscription-based pay-as-you-go model); includes licensing, compute, maintenance, and support. |
|
Infrastructure Management |
Limited agility; not designed for real-time data, mobile-first, or AI-driven insights. |
High agility; built for digital transformation, mobility, real-time data, and AI-driven decision-making |
|
Business Agility & Innovation |
Limited agility; not designed for real-time data, mobile-first, or AI-driven insights. |
High agility; built for digital transformation, mobility, real-time data, and AI-driven decision-making |
Microsoft Dynamics 365 vs AX: Differences in Deployment & Hosting
The key difference lies in deployment in the Microsoft Dynamics AX vs 365.
Dynamics 365 is deployed on Azure, so no physical infrastructure is needed. Setup is automated primarily, leveraging guided wizards to make deployment easier and reduce go-live timelines.
AX requires manual setup and configuration on local servers, introducing complexity and delays.
Although Dynamics 365 accelerates the initial deployment, customizations and integrations can complicate things based on your business needs.
Microsoft Dynamics AX vs 365: How System Customization Compares
When it comes to the difference between Microsoft Dynamics AX and 365, customization is another major shift.
AX applied an overlay strategy, adding custom code to the core code, typically causing intricate, hazardous merges upon updating or applying hotfixes.
With Dynamics 365, Microsoft re-architected the platform to avoid directly modifying the base code. Instead, customizations are made through extensions, and updates become easier with fewer compatibility problems. Testing is still required, but the process is much more efficient and decreases the likelihood of system interference.
Korcomptenz: Partnering for the Next Leap Beyond Dynamics AX
With over 20 years of experience as a Microsoft Gold Partner, Korcomptenz assists you in transitioning beyond legacy platforms such as AX to the future of Dynamics 365. Based in New Jersey, we enable businesses to confidently make the Dynamics AX vs Dynamics 365 transition, realizing new value through cloud-first ERP, Azure services, advanced analytics, AI, and IoT.
Our capabilities cover the entire Microsoft Dynamics 365 portfolio—Business Central, Finance and Operations, and CRM—to assist you in transforming operations, driving growth, and preparing your digital strategy for the future.
Final Words
In the MS Dynamics AX vs 365 debate, the writing is on the wall—AX did its job well, but the future is in the cloud.
While AX remains a robust ERP with strong capabilities, it was designed for a bygone era predating mobile-first workforces, real-time information, and AI-driven insights. Continuing legacy, on-premises infrastructure such as AX means more cost, less agility, and increased operational risk.
Dynamics 365 was designed specifically for this era of digital transformation. It provides the flexibility, scalability, and innovation companies require to remain competitive without the burden of complex infrastructure to maintain.
What is the difference between Dynamics AX and Microsoft Dynamics 365? It’s not technology alone, it’s about changing the way your business works, innovates, and expands.
Don’t let legacy hold you back. Embrace synamics 365 ERP implementation. Contact us today!
Share this article
Facebook
LinkedIn
Twitter
Use AI to summarize this article
